Barnard women recently received an email instructing them to "go green," giving a list of environmentally-friendly suggestions that would save the university money. I'm not really sure this is the right approach. After all, the eco reps have existed well before Sparr announced the diminished endowment. Long before it was fashionable, eco reps encouraged students to engage in "green" projects -- to always choose the green option-- which is not always the cheapest. (See: those expensive lightbulbs. grumph.)
But recently, going green has overlapped with the self-interests of our wallets. It saves energy to turn off the lights when you leave the room, and it saves money! (Of course, there are debates arguing that depending on the number of times the light switch will be flicked, the constant surges of energy is actually worse and more costly than just leaving the lights on to begin with. But that is neither here nor there ...
Given the ensuing economic downturn, do you think that we will be seeing more "green" jargon laced with economic incentives rather than the usual "do the right thing" incentive? (or whatever else hippies lace their propaganda with these days...)
Entire message to Barnard students after the jump.
Continued...
Recent comments
13 hours 36 min ago
2 days 4 hours ago
2 days 12 hours ago
3 days 16 hours ago
3 days 16 hours ago
3 days 16 hours ago
3 days 16 hours ago
3 days 16 hours ago
3 days 16 hours ago
3 days 16 hours ago