If any of you out there were hoping for a debate that would be entertaining, whether through Joe Biden's trademark gaffe-prone sense of humor, or Sarah Palin's seeming inability to form a complete thought, you were severely disappointed. Biden stayed clear of any possible gaffes, and Palin turned in a surprisingly strong performance. Though there were few surprises or laughs, what we did get was an honest-to-god debate that highlighted the differences between the two campaigns, shed light on important issues of the election, and gave us insight into the two vice presidential candidates.
So, the vice presidentional debate has come and gone, and the pundits seem to have declared Joe Biden as the winner. However, I'm not so sure that that debate was a clear victory for either campaign. Yes, Biden came off as confident, knowledgeable, and trustworthy, and defended the Obama campaign well against the talking points that Palin so skillfully attacked him with, but is that enough to woo reluctant voters into the Obama camp?
Similarly, Palin came on and did everything the pundits said she needed to do. She avoided looking like a total political newcomer, stayed relentlessly on message (so much so that she often ignored the questions of moderator Gwen Ifill), and brought up every possible talking point the McCain campaign could have possibly wanted. But was that enough to sway voters who are on the verge of losing their houses and jobs (if they haven't already faced that humiliation)?
My answer is no. Neither of those performances was good enough to bring independents and undecideds into the fold. While both candidates gave gutsy and skilled performances, I didn't see anything that would sway me to either side. Sure, Joe Biden highlighted the differences between Obama and McCain well enough, but where was the vigor and passion behind those attacks? Why should people believe that the facts and ideas that he highlighted will help them in the long run? Palin towed the campaign line and performed admirably, but I didn't get any sense that her performance was anything other than a political calculation designed to tear down Obama and get voters to relate to the McCain campaign based on gut feelings, and not the issues that are important to them.
My point is this: despite the passing of the bailout, American faces an uphill battle to get its economy back on track. Meanwhile, while the candidates are out there playing at politics, Americans are suffering everyday. Not only should the candidates do the right thing and talk to people about how they will make our lives better, but they should recognize that it is in their best political interests to focus on the issues rather than the fluff that McCain-Palin is peddling, or trying to continually paint McCain as out of touch.
These are tough times, and we need real leaders. If Thursday night's debate was any indication, Biden and Palin are not the leaders we are searching for.






Not necessarily
Yeah, it's a problem that campaigns do not show whether candidates have really got the skills. But it's expecting a lot that really valuable discussion could take place on the massive scale of a presidential campaign, with so much power at stake. It's not surprising that the substance of campaigns stick to easier soundbite subjects.
Even if the debate didn't demonstrate that either candidate is qualified, it doesn't follow that both candidates must be unqualified. After all, the best and smartest president in the world could potentially tune out all his/her intelligence for 90 minutes and spew out some nonsense, and they could still be qualified. The real problem is with the debates, not the candidates. The forums we have in campaigns discourage the type of conversation - i.e substantive, valuable, meaningful, rational - you are talking about. Palin showed that the debate system is so weak that someone could potentially show up and read a long speech without ever responding and get away with it. Props to her for figuring it out. If the forum allows that, and it's good for her campaign, why on earth wouldn't she do that and subject herself to the wrath of Biden.
And to be fair, this campaign has had a slightly higher tone than prior ones. The less honorable attacks are mainly policy related. "Sex education for kindergarteners" is a step up from "you lied about the war you fought in 30 years ago" and both campaigns have some idea of reforming the system (Country first, change) in their messages. McCain even suggested early on that there should be something like 11 town halls with both candidates. Imagine W. making that offer.
It isn't a lost cause. Some changes are possible that can make the better conversation you're talking about more likely. The U.S should have a forum, ala Britain, where opponents freely question each other in front of the public. Anyway, I don't think we should fault candidates for exploiting a bad system.
i think what he's trying to
i think what he's trying to say here is,where are the leaders who will seek to rise above a broken system in the interests of the american people rather than simply gaming the system for success' sake? where are the leaders who will earnestly and sincerely try to improve the lives of americans rather than playing ideological and political games? if biden and palin were any kind of leaders, they would define the system, not let the system define them. it's as simple as that. saying that the campaigns have good slogans or that their brand of dirty politics is better than others is inane and irrelevant. in these times, we need leaders who speak truth to power and america, not leaders who tack to the same old broken system to scare up votes or neglect their responsibilities to guide us to a better day.
GEPgefYcOhIcONu
Just cause it's simple doesn't mean it's not super heplufl.
Post new comment