by Black Russian at 11:48 pm on January 27, 2010

For tragically obvious reasons the nation of Haiti has been in the news a lot lately, yet as more marketable events such as Obama’s State of the Union address enter the 24-hour news cycle and the dramatic search and rescue operations have been suspended by the Haitian government, perhaps it is finally time to take a look at the problems facing Haiti before and after the earthquake. As we all (hopefully) know the significance of Haiti cannot and should not be reduced to natural disaster. Haiti’s story is a sad one that has only culminated in the devastating earthquake.

 

Haiti and the United States have had intimate relations since both were slave societies, and both countries were the first two to liberate themselves from colonial rule. While the United States was merely beginning an era of expansion (of both free territories and slave territories), Haiti was only beginning her career as an exploited and stigmatized society. The reason for this, of course, was the former was a white-dominated slave society while the latter was a living definition of the hypocrisy of racism, slavery, and colonization. The first black republic was always doomed to suffer.

Normal 0 false false false EN-US ZH-CN AR-SA MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

 

After gaining her independence, Haiti was obligated to pay “reparations” to France until 1947, yet that was only the beginning of the exploitation of Haitians. The plantation system that flourished under the French naturally had to be abolished under the revolutionary government, but the indebted state that emerged could do little for its people beyond tax them. It is true that the Haitian government was corrupt, but the same could be said about any government, wealthy or not. One need only look at local, state, and national governments in the United States after the Civil War to know that, and even the Confederacy was granted a partial repudiation of debt. Haiti, of course, was never so lucky.

 

The twentieth century would hardly be kinder to Haiti than the nineteenth. From 1915 to 1934 Haiti was occupied by the United States military, even though most academics assume the period of American imperialism ended with her entrance into World War I. Post-Civil War Reconstruction had convinced many American leaders that blacks simply could not govern themselves, and indeed the initial invasion of Haiti was ordered by Woodrow Wilson, arguably the most racist president in American history. According to Eric Foner, under American occupation “the Haitian constitution was altered to permit alien landownership (which was barred after the revolution), the tax structure was revised to encourage sugar production, and plans were laid to promote large-scale investment of American capital.” The United States military would continue to occupy Haiti periodically until the present day, with Clinton and now Obama the most recent presidents to give such orders.

 

Here one can be led to think “that’s not fair. Obama is responding to the devastating earthquake.” Well here are some interesting facts about his policy towards relief in Haiti. For every dollar the US government spends in Haiti less than one cent has gone to the Haitian government, who should be allowed to lead the rescue and reconstruction efforts of their own people (one wonders if the notion among Americans that Haitians are incapable of self-government ever disintegrated). 42 cents of every dollar has gone to disaster assistance, 33 cents (a full third of the budget) has gone to military “aid” (and one wonders which military is being aided), and an unforgivably meager 9 cents to the dollar has gone towards food. Strangely, American spending on relief has more than tripled from $100 million to $379 million. The question, of course, is where all that money is going. It is probably too early to tell, but one wonders whether relief money is any safer in the hands of the United States Agency for Industrial Development (USAID) than it would be with the Haitian government.

 

My guess is that there is an understandable hesitance in the reader to make the earthquake in Haiti a political matter, but the fact is American-Haitian relations have always been political and deeply rooted in the economic interests of the United States government and corporations. The tragedy of Haiti is not one relating to a natural disaster. Earthquakes, albeit of lesser magnitudes, have hit Haiti many times. No, much like Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans the tragedy if Haiti was man-made, and it is rooted in our relationship with what we have come to term “the Third World,” which is indeed worlds apart. It is a result of the hypocritical foreign policy of the United States Government, and the failure of most Americans to look ourselves in the mirror to see ourselves the way our neo-colonial subjects view us: as an imperialist threat to world peace. Let us not forget that as the West attempts to reconstruct Haiti.

 


  • facebook
  • google
  • Digg
  • Twit This
  • email

Comments

So you're insinuating that

So you're insinuating that Obama has a sinister plan to oppress Haiti through ... digging Haitians out of the ruin of the earthquake? I understand that Haiti and America have their past together, but it's hard for me to see any ulterior motive in a relief mission, especially in a nation as inconsequential to our foreign policy as Haiti.

No

I'm not trying to imply there's a sinister plan to oppress Haiti, because this history I'm telling speaks for itself. I'm saying if we don't truly learn from history we are doomed to repeat it. All one need to is look what they trade with their two major trading partners, the US and France (the two countries that have this "problematic" history with Haiti). They trade food to those two countries and take on massive amounts of debt. I'm saying considering our history we owe Haiti more than relief, since as you admit we have "this past together." If we really want to do right by Haiti, let's spend less on military occupation (which is a major source of anger among many Haitians) and more on repudiating their debt to us, which as of 1993 (a long time ago I might add) was over $600 million. Maybe we can try to help them solve their unemployment crisis, too. Do you have any suggestions on how we can help Haiti in a more long-lasting way, keeping in mind many policy-makers believe it is in our national interest to keep Haiti's national debt high and them so dependent on us?

so skewed

Dear Black Russian,

"For every dollar the US government spends in Haiti less than one cent has gone to the Haitian government, who should be allowed to lead the rescue and reconstruction efforts of their own people (one wonders if the notion among Americans that Haitians are incapable of self-government ever disintegrated)."

Your simplistic view that America disallows Haitians to do anything or that they are our "subjects" as stated in the last graph is skewed and hypocritical -- they are sovereign and free. Besides, we wouldn't be there if Haiti didn't need us to spend our hard-earned tax dollars on them. When will people like you wake up and realize that America is the greatest country and we are a force of good will in this world? By the way, nice job blaming the whites.

Who's Hypocritical?

I studied abroad in a Third-World country that is very dependent on the United States economically, and I can tell you from first-hand experience that it is hypocritical to claim that a country that is sovereign and free. It is hypocritical for you to call them sovereign and free in on sentence and in the next say they need us to spend our hard-earned tax dollars. Furthermore you ignore my point about that the Haitian government should be allowed to lead the rescue and reconstruction efforts in their own country. A truly sovereign nation could do that, but you want to call them sovereign to legitimate ignoring them for your "hard-earned tax dollars" (do you even have a job?). Economic dependence is not the freedom to self-determination, pure and simple. I dare you to visit Haiti, see the country for yourself, and try to make that point again.

I do have a job

I was in the Marines and our unit went to Haiti to help them with rebels a few years ago. I have traveled and lived in 13 other countries in my life. We are a sovereign nation yet we borrow money and receive monetary help from others (China). I'm sure you had a rough time during your study abroad experience and have the t-shirt to prove it. But I have first hand experience working directly with an eroded government ruled by rebels. You say the US military occupies Haiti as if we took it by storm, yet we aid in the recovery a national disaster while others stand by. I say you are naive.

I do have a job

I was in the Marines and our unit went to Haiti to help them with rebels a few years ago. I have traveled and lived in 13 other countries in my life. We are a sovereign nation yet we borrow money and receive monetary help from others (China). I'm sure you had a rough time during your study abroad experience and have the t-shirt to prove it. But I have first hand experience working directly with an eroded government ruled by rebels. You say the US military occupies Haiti as if we took it by storm, yet we aid in the recovery a national disaster while others stand by. I say you are naive.

p.s.

Hey,

I don't mean to be harsh. But you evidently don't realize the basic fact that if we just handed the Haitian government millions of dollars in relief money and left them to their own devices they would grab it and run for the hills while tens of thousands of people rotted in the streets. That is what would happen. Believe it or don't.

Let me start by apologizing

Let me start by apologizing by assuming you were not a hard-working American. Most Columbians (at least those who like to sit around posting on blogs) have yet be that, and I think we can agree on that. And let me also say I respect your service to our country, and I my hope is that American troops overseas will be returned to America ASAP.

But I am not naive, and my experience overseas gave me more than a T-Shirt, it gave me friends for life. Friends with all the capabilities to take care of themselves and others. In fact my service this summer will entail building a school in a rural village that I stayed in. I would like to respectfully point out that you have contradicted yourself a bit: you originally said Haiti is sovereign and free, but now you agree they shouldn't be allowed to rescue themselves, which is where we can agree to disagree. That was my original point though. "It appears the notion that Haitians are incapable of self-government never left many Americans." Furthermore, I was not "blaming the whites" as you say, but to ignore the racist history in American foreign policy is wrong. On the flip side, our entrance into a conflict like WWII was I believe justified. But these cases with Haiti are completely different from WWII, and to compare them is a disservice to those who died fighting facism.

I would like to also point out that when you are dealing with a highly impoverished population, your assumption that they cannot take care of themselves is circular logic. They cannot take care of themselves so we will withhold from them the ability to do so, but without the means to take care of themselves they will never have the ability to do so. If people are deprived of a decent education and are impoverished, a paternalist attitude only reinforces itself despite its contradictions. While you may not like the comparison, the enslavement of Afro-Americans in the United States is testament to my point. Haitians are homo sapiens just like us and have all the capabilities we do. I only ask we not just help them, but also help them help themselves. If not you're not really helping them at all.

and by the way, to compare

and by the way, to compare the debt of the Haitian government to that of the US is absurd. we have a much bigger stick than they do, a much higher credit rating than they do (even though it sounds like you don't believe we should have such a high credit rating, which I may be inclined to agree with), a much bigger GDP than they do (and a larger working population too), and we have the ear of the world, not to mention billions if not trillions in "rainy day reserves". if you've traveled as much as you say you have, you know such a comparison is insane.

and by the way, to compare

and by the way, to compare the debt of the Haitian government is absurd. We have a much bigger stick than they do, we have a higher credit rating (perhaps undeserved, but still), we have plenty of rainy-day money in reserves, a higher GDP and working population, and the list goes on. if you want a better comparison, try the government of my hometown, Oakland, CA, which is being robbed of its revenue by the state government that likewise has a tremendous debt. considering the level of violence there, maybe the US could send forces to pacify that situation? that won't happen for obvious reasons though.

Post new comment

  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p><br>

More information about formatting options